Session

Ureteroscopy: Has it reached the limit?

Poster Session 89

  • Location:
    Room Paris (Hall B2, level 0)
  • Chairs:
     G. Giusti, Milan (IT)
     I. Saltirov, Sofia (BG)
  • Aims and objectives of this session

    Is URS the potential treatment of choice for all upper urinary tract stones and has it taken the places of PNL and SWL? This session focuses on outcomes of URS compared to its competitors

  • Poster viewing of 20 minutes. Presentations will take place on stage. Standard presentations are 2 minutes in length, followed by 2 minutes for discussion. Extended presentations (*) are 3 minutes in length, followed by 3 minutes for discussion.
1129
Emergency versus elective URS: What do the patients choose?

By: Malkhasyan V.1, Semenyakin I.2, Ivanov V.3

Institutes: 1Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Dept. of Urology, Moscow, Russia, 2Moscow City Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Moscow, Russia, 3Moscow City Hospital , Dept. of Urology, Moscow, Russia

1130
The surgical experience influences the safety but not efficacy of RIRS for kidney stones: A propensity score analysis

By: Berardinelli F.1, De Francesco P.1, Cindolo L.1, Pellegrini F.1, Proietti S.2, Peschechera R.2, Dalpiaz O.3, Dennessey D.4, Cracco C.5, Scoffone C.5, Schips L.1, Giusti G.6

Institutes: 1Ospedale S. Pio Da Pitrelcina, Dept. of Urology, Vasto, Italy, 2Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Dept. of Urology, Stone Center, Rozzano, Italy, 3Medizinische Universität Graz, Dept. of Urology, Graz, Austria, 4Craigavon Area Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Portadown, United Kingdom, 5Ospedale Cottolengo, Dept. of Urology, Turin, Italy, 6Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Stone Center At Department of Urology, Rozzano, Italy

1131
To evaluate efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for stones 10-30 mm size

By: Sharma A.K., Yadav R., Singh K., Gulia A., Dassi V., Chauhan U., Kumar A.

Institutes: Max Superspecialty Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Delhi, India

1132
A randomized controlled trial comparing flexible ureteroscopy, semirigid ureteroscopy (URS) and extracorporeal shockwaves lithotripsy (SWL) for treatment of 0.5-1cm proximal ureteric stones

By: Abdullateef M., Shoma A., Sheir K., El-Nahas A., Mansour A., Elshal A., Ibrahiem E-H.

Institutes: Mansoura University, Dept. of Urology, Mansoura, Egypt

1133
Pediatric FURS vs PCNL for renal stones < 2 cm: A randomized controlled study

By: Gamal Saad W., Ahmed M.

Institutes: Sohag University Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Sohag, Egypt

1134
Are urologists safe from radiation hazard? A study about the radiation exposure in urologists who perform ureteroscopic lithotripsy

By: Kim K.T.1, Kim C.1, Kim S.2, Kim J.3, Song K.H.4, Kim T.B.1, Yoon S.J.1, Kim K.1

Institutes: 1Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Dept. of Urology, Incheon, South Korea, 2Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Seoul, South Korea, 3Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Bucheon, South Korea, 4Chungnam National University Hospital, The Chungnam National University of Korea College of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Daejeon, South Korea

1135
Fluoroscopic beam collimation during ureteroscopy and its effect on dose

By: Horsburgh B.

Institutes: Wirral University Teaching Hospital Nhs Foundation Trust, Dept. of Urology, Wirral, United Kingdom

1136
Radiation exposure of the surgeon: Benefit and practicability of a lead-acryl protection shield during ureteroscopy

By: Knoll T., Jessen J. P., Kohns H., Steiner R., Umbach R., Wendt-Nordahl G.

Institutes: Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen, Dept. of Urology, Sindelfingen, Germany

* 1137
Semi-rigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones: Does adjunctive tamsulosin therapy increase the chance of success?

By: Ahmed A-F.2, Maarouf A.M.1, Alshahrani S.2, Shalaby E.3

Institutes: 1Zagazig University Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Zagazig, Egypt, 2Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Dept. of Urology, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia, 3Suez Canal University, Dept. of Urology, Ismailia, Egypt

1138
100% stone free – revisited? Lessons to be learned from long-term follow-up

By: Hein S.1, Miernik A.1, Wilhelm K.1, Schoeb D.S.1, Schlager D.1, Adams F.1, Vach W.2, Schoenthaler M.1

Institutes: 1Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Dept. of Urology, Freiburg, Germany, 2University of Freiburg, Center for Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, Freiburg, Germany

1139
Prognostic factors of acute pyelonephritis after flexible ureteroscopy

By: Alezra E., Forzini T., Francois T., Caillet K., Lecuelle D., Lasselin J., Lipsker A., Saint F.

Institutes: Amiens University Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Amiens, France

1140
Predictive factors for infective complications following flexible ureteroscopy: A prospective multicenter European study

By: Berardinelli F.1, De Francesco P.1, Cindolo L.1, Pellegrini F.1, Proietti S.2, Peschechera R.2, Dalpiaz O.3, Hennessey D.4, Cracco C.5, Scoffone C.5, Schips L.1, Giusti G.2

Institutes: 1Ospedale S. Pio Da Pitrelcina, Dept. of Urology, Vasto, Italy, 2Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Dept. of Urology, Rozzano, Italy, 3Medizinische Universität Graz, Dept. of Urology, Graz, Austria, 4Craigavon Area Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Portadown, United Kingdom, 5Ospedale Cottolengo, Dept. of Urology, Turin, Italy

1141
Pressure bags for enhanced visibility in FURS. Are they reliable in terms of intrarenal pressure?

By: Dragos L.B., Proietti S., Buttice S., Traxer O.

Institutes: Tenon Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Paris, France

Summary and context
 G. Giusti, Basiglio (IT)