Outcomes in radical prostatectomy

Poster Session 53

  • Location:
    Room 14b (ICM, Level 1)
  • Chairs:
     B.J. Challacombe, London (GB)
     E.M. Johansson, Uppsala (SE)
     Q-D. Trinh, Boston (US)
  • Aims and objectives of this session

    During this session, results of radical prostatectomy will be discussed including the impact of surgical expertise and learning curves.

  • Poster viewing of 20 minutes. Presentations will take place on stage. Standard presentations are 2 minutes in length, followed by 2 minutes for discussion. Extended presentations (*) are 3 minutes in length, followed by 3 minutes for discussion.
* 660
A population based analysis of complications after radical prostatectomy – results from the German DRG database

By: Schmitges J.1, Rose J.1, Pollmanns J.2, Graefen M.3, Neukirch B.2, Friedrich M.G.1, Droesler S.2, Weyermann M.2

Institutes: 1Helios Hospital Krefeld, Dept. of Urology, Krefeld, Germany, 2Niederrhein University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health Care, Krefeld, Germany, 3Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Centre, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

* 661
Surgical expertise represents a strong determinant of early continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

By: Suardi N., Fossati N., Gandaglia G., Dell’Oglio P., Gallina A., Zaffuto E., Farina E., Picozzi M., Pini G., Gaboardi F., Montorsi F., Briganti A.

Institutes: IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Dept. of Oncology and Urology, Milan, Italy

Prospective randomized trial comparing the use of titan clips versus bipolar coagulation to seal lymphatic vessels during robot-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection and radical prostatectomy

By: Grande P., Di Pierro G.B., Mordasini L., Ferrari M., Danuser H., Mattei A.

Institutes: Luzerner Kantonsspital, Dept. of Urology, Lucerne, Switzerland

Scoring surgical skill in robotic prostatectomy as adherence to the surgical plan: Proposal for a new tool (ScAPSA)

By: Dal Moro F.1, Gardiman M.P.2, Zattoni F.1

Institutes: 1Universita’ di Padova – Azienda Ospedaliera, Dept. of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology and Dept. of Urology, Padua, Italy, 2Universita’ di Padova – Azienda Ospedaliera, Dept. of Pathology, Padua, Italy

Robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: An old but new method to draw learning curves

By: Okano M.1, Ivanovic R.2, Nomelini Q.S.S.5, Morais H.1, Jr. Pontes J.1, Salles M.1, Reis S.1, Savio L.1, Srougi M.3, Vuolo C.1, Passerotti C.4

Institutes: 1German Hospital Oswaldo Cruz, Robotic Surgery Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2German Hospital Oswaldo Cruz, Dept. of Robotic Surgery, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 3University of São Paulo, Dept. of Urology, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 4German Hospital Oswaldo Cruz, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 5Federal University of Uberlândia, Dept. of Urology, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Do functional outcomes correlate with long-term quality of life 5-years after radical prostatectomy?

By: Löppenberg B., Bach P., Von Bodman C., Roghmann F., Noldus J., Palisaar J.

Institutes: Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Dept. of Urology, Herne, Germany

Single surgeon perioperative and early functional results of initial 64 RARPs after graduating “ERUS robotic urology curriculum fellowship (pilot study II)” for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)

By: Salwa P., Wagner C., Schuette A., Harke N., Witt J.

Institutes: St. Antonius-Hospital Gronau GmbH, Dept. of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology – Prostate Center Northwest, Ebu Certified Sub-Speciality Centre, Gronau, Germany

Factors influencing recovery of erectile function following robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP)

By: Palayapalayam Ganapathi H., Ogaya G., Woodlief T., Rogers T., Mouraviev V., Patel V.

Institutes: Global Robotics Institute, Center For Urologic Cancer, Celebration, United States of America

A total population analysis of in-hospital outcomes of radical prostatectomy in Germany from 2006 to 2013: Impact of surgical approach and the degree of specialisation

By: Groeben C.1, Koch R.2, Baunacke M.1, Wirth M.1, Huber J.1

Institutes: 1Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dept. of Urology, Dresden, Germany, 2Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dept. of Medical Statistics and Biometry, Dresden, Germany

Surgeon and hospital variation in the costs of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the United States

By: Meyer C.1, Cole A.1, Leow J.1, Chang S.1, Kibel A.1, Menon M.2, Sammon J.2, Chung B.3, Sun M.1, Trinh Q-D.1

Institutes: 1Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dept. of Urologic Surgery and Center For Surgery and Public Health, Boston, United States of America, 2Henry Ford Hospital, Vatikutti Urology Institute, Detroit, United States of America, 3Stanford University Medical Center, Dept. of Urology, Palo Alto, United States of America

Single positive lymph node prostate cancer can be surgically cured in selective cases

By: Kim D.K.2, Alatawi A.2, Alabdulaali I.2, Sheikh A.2, Abdel Raheem A.1, Ham W.S.2, Chung B.H.2, Rha K.H.2

Institutes: 1Yonsei University College of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Seoul, South Korea, 2Yonsei University College of Medicine, Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Seoul, South Korea

Results of surgical treatment of patients with high and very high risk prostate cancer: Is there a chance of curative operation?

By: Nyushko K.1, Alekseev B.2, Krasheninnikov A.3, Sergienko S.3, Kalpinskiy A.3, Vorobyev N.3, Kaprin A.4

Institutes: 1P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute, Dept. of Oncourology, Moscow, Russia, 2P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute, Deputy Director for Scientific Work, Moscow, Russia, 3P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute, Dept. of Urology, Moscow, Russia, 4P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute, Head of the Institution, Moscow, Russia

Summary and context
 E.M. Johansson, Uppsala (SE)