Session

Evaluation in radical prostatectomy

Poster Session 36

  • Location:
    Room 14c (ICM, Level 1)
  • Chairs:
     C.G. Eden, Odiham (GB)
     G. Janetschek, Salzburg (AT)
     H.G. Van Der Poel
  • Aims and objectives of this session

    Several urological teams will present their radical prostatectomy results in terms of positive margins, erectile function and continence rates but will also compare their surgical techniques such as retropubic space-sparing approach and importance of neurovascular bundle thickness.

  • Poster viewing of 20 minutes. Presentations will take place on stage. Standard presentations are 2 minutes in length, followed by 2 minutes for discussion. Extended presentations (*) are 3 minutes in length, followed by 3 minutes for discussion.
* 442
Four-year outcome of a prospective randomised trial comparing laparoscopic versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

By: Fiori C.1, Morra I.1, Manfredi M.2, Mele F.2, Bertolo R.2, Cattaneo G.2, Poggio M.2, Ragni F.2, Amparore D.2, De Cillis S.2, Checcucci E.2, De Luca S.2, Porpiglia F.2

Institutes: 1San Luigi Hospital, Dept. of Urology, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy, 2San Luigi Hospital, Dept. of Urology, University of Turin, Orbassano , Italy

443
Minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy: An analysis of 30-day postoperative complications, unplanned readmissions, and mortality

By: Meyer C.1, Sood A.2, Abdollah F.2, Sammon J.2, Vetterlein M.1, Löppenberg B.1, Hanske J.1, Leow J.1, Cole A.1, Sun M.1, Menon M.2, Trinh Q-D.1

Institutes: 1Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Division of Urologic Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, United States of America, 2Henry Ford Hospital / Health System, Vattikuti Institute of Urology, Center for Outomes Research, Analystics and Evaluation, Detroit, United States of America

444
Variation between experienced surgeons in oncological and functional outcome after prostatectomy. A comparison between open and robotic surgeons in the Swedish LAPPRO study

By: Nyberg M.2, Carlsson S.3, Wilderäng U.4, Vickers A.5, Stranne J.1, Steineck G.6, Wiklund P.7, Haglind E.8, Bjartell A.2, Hugosson J.1

Institutes: 1Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Dept. of Urology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Dept. of Urology, Malmö, Sweden, 3Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg/Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, Dept. of Urology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 4Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 5Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Dept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, New York, United States of America, 6Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology/Department of Oncology and Pathology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 7Karolinska Institutet, Dept. of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Stockholm, Sweden, 8Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Dept. of Surgery, Gothenburg, Sweden

445
Time to catheter removal after radical prostatectomy has no adverse effect on intermediate- and long-term continence rates

By: Preisser F., Tilki D., Graefen M., Huland H., Chun F.K.

Institutes: University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, Hamburg, Germany

446
Positive surgical margins after nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer

By: Godes M., Harke N., Addali M., Schütte A., Wagner C., Witt J.

Institutes: St. Antonius-Hospital Gronau GmbH, Dept. of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Gronau, Germany

447
Late recovery of erectile function in men treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP): A novel nomogram development and validation

By: Abdollah F.F.H.1, Dalela D.1, Sammon J.1, Sood A.1, Fossati N.2, Gandaglia G.2, Suardi N.2, Gaboardi F.2, Pini G.2, Jeong W.1, Rogers C.1, Peabody J.1, Montorsi F.2, Briganti A.2, Menon M.1

Institutes: 1Henry Ford Hospital / Health System, Dept. of Urology, Detroit, United States of America, 2Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Dept. of Urology, Milan, Italy

448
Is a well-performed robot-assisted radical prostatectomy the real focal therapy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer?

By: Gandaglia G.1, Fossati N.2, Gallina A.2, Di Trapani E.3, Dehò F.2, Mottrie A.5, Larcher A.2, Bianchi M.4, Picozzi M.2, Farina E.2, Gaboardi F.2, Montorsi F.2, Briganti A.2

Institutes: 1Irccs Ospedale San Raffaele; Uri, Dept. of Urology, Milan, Italy, 2IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI, Milan, Italy, 3Diaconesses-Croix Saint Simon Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Paris, France, 4Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Dept. of Urology, Catanzaro, Italy, 5OLV Vattikuti Robotic Surgery Institute, ORSI, Melle, Belgium

449
Extended vs limited pelvic lymph node dissection during bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy and its effect on continence and erectile function recovery: Long-term results and trifecta rates of a comparative analysis

By: Hatzichristodoulou G.1, Wagenpfeil S.2, Wagenpfeil G.3, Gschwend J.1, Kübler H.1

Institutes: 1Technical University of Munich, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Dept. of Urology, Munich, Germany, 2Saarland University Hospital, Institute For Medical Biometry and Dept. of Epidemiology and Medical Informatics, Homburg, Germany, 3Saarland University Hospital, Institute For Medical Biometry and Dept. of Epidemiology and Medical Informatics, Homburg, Germany

450
Comparative peri-operative, oncologic and continence study after 300 cases of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

By: Kim D.K.2, Alabdulaali I.2, Alatawi A.2, Sheikh A.2, Abdel Raheem A.1, Choi Y.D.2, Rha K.H.2

Institutes: 1Yonsei University College of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Seoul, South Korea, 2Yonsei University College of Medicine, Dept. of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Seoul, South Korea

451
Relationship between immediate continence and early potency recovery after PERUSIA radical prostatectomy

By: Boni A.1, Cochetti G.1, Lepri E.1, Lepri L.1, D’Amico F.E.2, Mearini E.1

Institutes: 1University of Perugia, Dept. of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Division of Urologic, Andrologic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Techniques, Perugia, Italy, 2University of Perugia, Dept. of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Division of Urologic, Andrologic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Techniques, Terni, Italy

452
Impact of thickness of spared neurovascular bundle on postoperative urinary and sexual outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: An ongoing prospective study

By: Yoo S.1, Choi S.Y.1, Jung J.1, Nam W.1, Han J.H.1, Hong S.2, Kim H.J.2, Kwon T.3, Moon K.H.3, You D.1, Jeong I.G.1, Ahn T.Y.1, Kim C-S.1

Institutes: 1Asan Medical Center, Dept. of Urology, Seoul, South Korea, 2Dankook University College of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Seoul, South Korea, 3Ulsan University Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Ulsan, South Korea

453
Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter improves early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

By: Pushkar D.1, Govorov A.1, Rasner P.1, Kolontarev K.1, Rocco B.2

Institutes: 1Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Dept. of Urology, Moscow, Russia, 2Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Dept. of Urology, Milan, Italy